Cream versus ointment: Randomized single-blinded study on the adherence to treatment with topical methylprednisolone aceponate.

BACKGROUND: Overall adherence in the treatment of chronic dermatoses is poor. Textbooks state an adherence dependence on galenics. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, parallel-grouped, single-blinded (investigator), monocentric clinical trial (phase IV) on the adherence to treatment of chronic mild to moderate hand eczema with topical methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA, Advantan®) in different vehicles. OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS: Primary objective was the assessment of the adherence depending on vehicle type in patients with chronic hand eczema. Secondary objective was improvement after a 4-week treatment period. Primary Endpoint Adherence is defined as the percentage of patients applying at least aimed daily dose. Prescribed daily dose was defined as the planned number of applications per day (1) * surface (measured) * aimed amount per application (mg/cm2 ). Truly applicated daily dose was evaluated as individual mean amount per dose * individual mean number of applications per day. Adherence was assumed, if truly applicated daily dose is at least 75% of the prescribed daily dose and the individual mean number of applications per day is at least 0.85. Secondary Endpoint Efficacy was measured by improvement of Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) after a 4-week treatment period and in addition to Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pruritus. METHODS: Number of participants randomized to each group 40, 80 total. Group 1 MPA-C: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Group 2 MPA-FO: Methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% fatty ointment and barrier repair emollient (Bepanthen® Sensiderm). Adherence to treatment was compared via Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the patients, 48% were adherent according to our definition. There was no significant difference between MPA-C (42.1%) and MPA-FO (54.1%; p = 0.36; group difference-12.0%, 95% CI-34.3%-11.5%). Generalized-linear-model-analysis of adherence to study treatment with factors emollient use, treatment, time and treatment-time interaction showed a parallel between adherence and amount of emollient use (odds ratio 1.74, p = 0.0038; 95% CI-1.22-2.52). Improvement of hand eczema was seen according to clinical scores without remarkable differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No dependence of adherence on galenics of topical treatment of chronic hand eczema could be proved. Patients who use more emollient tend to be more adherent to the topical treatment.

Outcome of Older Patients with Acute Neuropsychological Symptoms Not Fulfilling Criteria of Delirium.

OBJECTIVES: Although delirium is often investigated, little is known about the outcomes of patients having acute neuropsychological changes at a single time point without fulfilling the criteria of full delirium. Our aim was to determine point prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes of delirium and acute neuropsychological changes in patients aged 60 years and older across different departments of a university hospital with general inpatient care. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University hospital excluding psychiatric wards. PARTICIPANTS: At baseline, 669 patients were assessed, and follow-ups occurred at months 6, 12, 18, and 36. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were obtained using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), comprehensive geriatric assessment, health-related quality of life, functional state (month 6), and mortality rates (months 6, 12, 18, and 36). Subjects were classified into (1) patients with delirium according to the CAM, (2) patients with only two positive CAM items (2-CAM state), and (3) patients without delirium. RESULTS: Delirium was present in 10.8% and the 2-CAM state in an additional 12.7% of patients. Highest prevalence of delirium was observed in medical and surgical intensive care units and neurosurgical wards. Cognitive restrictions, restricted mobility, electrolyte imbalance, the number of medications per day, any fixations, and the presence of a urinary catheter predicted the presence of delirium and 2-CAM-state. The mean Karnofsky Performance Score and EuroQol-5D were comparable between delirium and the 2-CAM state after 6 months. The 6-, 12-, 18-, and 36-month mortality rates of patients with delirium and the 2-CAM state were comparable. The nurses' evaluation of distinct patients showed high specificity (89%) but low sensitivity (53%) for the detection of delirium in wide-awake patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with an acute change or fluctuation in mental status or inattention with one additional CAM symptom (ie, disorganized thinking or an altered level of consciousness) have a similar risk for a lower quality of life and death as patients with delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1469-1475, 2020.

Long-Term Survival Following Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: There have not yet been any prospective registry studies in Germany with active investigation of the long-term survival of patients with sepsis. METHODS: The Jena Sepsis Registry (JSR) included all patients with a diagnosis of sepsis in the four intensive care units of Jena University Hospital from January 2011 to December 2015. Long-term survival 6-48 months after diagnosis was documented by asking the treating general practitioners. The survival times were studied with Kaplan-Meier estimators. Cox regressions were calculated to show associations between possible predictors and survival time. RESULTS: 1975 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The mean time of observation was 730 days. For 96.4% of the queries to the general practitioners, information on long-term survival was available. Mortality in the intensive care unit was 34% (95% confidence interval [32; 37]), and in-hospital mortality was 45% [42; 47]. The overall mortality six months after diagnosis was 59% [57; 62], the overall mortality 48 months after diagnosis was 74% [72; 78]. Predictors of shorter survival were age, nosocomial origin of sepsis, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, and renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: The nearly 75% mortality four years after diagnosis indicates that changes are needed both in the acute treatment of patients with sepsis and in their multi-sector long-term care. The applicability of these findings may be limited by their having been obtained in a single center.

Overwhelming Postsplenectomy Infection: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent population-based cohort studies have questioned the role of pneumococci as the most frequent pathogen causing severe infection in patients after splenectomy. The aim of the study was to define the causative pathogens and clinical presentation of patients with overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study in 173 German intensive care units, we searched for patients with and without asplenia and community-acquired severe sepsis/septic shock. Clinical and laboratory variables and survival of patients were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with severe sepsis or septic shock with asplenia and 52 without asplenia were included. OPSI patients more often had a history of malignancy (38% vs 17%; P = .016) and had a lower body mass index (24 kg/m(2) vs 28 kg/m(2); P = .004). Streptococcus pneumoniae was detected more frequently in OPSI patients (42% vs 12% without asplenia; P < .001) and more frequently manifested as bloodstream infection (31% vs 6%; P = .002). Gram-negative infection was similar in both groups (12% vs 19%; P = .157). Pneumococcal vaccine coverage of OPSI patients was low overall (42% vs 8% among patients without asplenia; P < .001). Purpura fulminans was a frequent complication, developing in 19% of OPSI patients vs 5% of patients without asplenia (P = .038). The interval between splenectomy and OPSI was 6 years (range, 1 month-50 years). On multivariable Poisson regression, asplenia was the only predictive variable independently associated with pneumococcal sepsis (adjusted relative risk, 2.53 [95% confidence interval, 1.06-6.08]). CONCLUSIONS: Pneumococcal infections remain the most important cause of severe sepsis and septic shock following splenectomy.